GM food: a dinner discussion
By Jason Major
TechNyou
GM food: a dinner discussion
This will be a public forum to discuss the acceptability of using transgenic technologies to develop genetically modified crops that could play a role in food security.
TechNyou and the Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics at the University of Adelaide will host this forum in Melbourne on 10 August, as part of national Science Week. Twitter hashtag #GTmenu
Full event details and how to register for the event are on the event website
Why have the event?
There is no doubt we are going to have problems finding ways to feed the predicted extra 3 billion people by 2050. It is well acknowledged by many national and international reports that the answer does not lie in simply growing more food. Poverty, lack of agricultural development and skills in developing nations, poor infrastructure and distribution to get food to and from communities – not helped by war and corruption, and food wastage lost by poor storage or simply because we in the Western world disgracefully send perfectly good food to landfill. And these are just some of the constraints. Sorting these issues will go a long way to helping ensure a secure food supply, but we have been attempting unsuccessfully to sort these problems for decades so the question needs to be asked whether we can sort them by 2050 and consequently have them help achieve food security.
Regardless one part of the solution is to grow more of the right foods more efficiently. How will we do this? It is likely that it will require a re-think on agriculture – everything from the nutrient cycle, plant and animal breeding, water use…the whole system, including how we consume food, at least for us in the relatively well-fed western world.
The transgenic technologies behind the development of genetically modified foods are one of many plant breeding technologies at the disposal of scientists to breed crops with novel traits that could contribute to food security – some examples of these are mentioned below.
In the big picture transgenic technologies are only likely to play a minor role, but it could be an important role. It is also one of the more controversial technologies. Its importance and controversy is why we want to have this discussion. Your thoughts, inputs and concerns will help direct research priorities in this area; it will be a chance to learn more about what drives scientists working in this field – what they are doing and why, and equally they can learn from you; it will also be an opportunity to gain insight into what your fellow members of the community think and why.
How will the event work?
You, the audience will be role playing. You will pretend you are part of a committee charged by the government to put together a report about the worth of developing genetically modified crops specifically for the purpose of helping with food security. This is a global issue so you will need to be thinking about it from a global perspective.
We have asked four eminent experts in their fields to be part of event. They will be there for you to tap into for information and help you in your role, as members of this committee, to help you make informed decisions. Your other committee (audience) members will also be there for this purpose.
Full details about the experts can be found on the event’s website – www.genetechmenu.com
Now this all sounds serious stuff, but we will make sure it will be fun as well and informative. Chris Krishna-Pillay, your host and moderator for the night will make sure of that. Expect chocolate frogs or some other delicacies totally unnecessary for life randomly thrown your way, should Chris deem your question or comment worthy.
What sort of crops are we talking about?
Here are some examples of crops that are part of Australian research programs. Worldwide, there are many other similar research programs working on a range of crops, often local and endemic to a region.
Nitrogen-use-efficient (NUE) crops.
These are crops that use nitrogen fertiliser more efficiently. Generation of nitrogen fertiliser is an energy-intensive process that, at the moment, relies on fossil fuels. Additionally, excess nitrogen not used by the plant gets into waterways creating environmental problems such as algal blooms. NUE crops will require less nitrogen to be applied to the soil, yet still maintain crop yields. More about NUE crops at ACPFG
Iron-fortified rice
Micro-nutrient deficiencies are one of the world’s biggest health problems, especially in the developing nations. Polished rice (or white rice) contains low levels of iron (and other micro-nutrients such as Vitamin A). Dr Alex Johnson from the University of Melbourne’s Department of Botany is working on boosting the iron content of rice in an attempt to help alleviate the problem of iron deficiency that affects 2 billion people worldwide. Nobody is suggesting that this iron-rich rice will solve the problem, but the question we need to explore is whether this is an appropriate tool to help with the problem. Are there better ways that would negate the need to do this research, if so what are they?
Alex receives a lot of his funding for this research from HarvestPlus
Digestible pasture grass
This isn’t a GM crop that many people would be aware of, or even relate to the issue of food security, but we eat meat and the livestock eat grass. This grass should make grass more digestible and nutritious for livestock which means less energy is used to extract the energy from the grass and more energy in the grass is available for the animal. Or in other words you get more meat and milk with less grass.
This research is being done through the Dairy Cooperative Research Centre. One of the ways they are trying to achieve this is by silencing one of the genes involved in the production of a type of lignin, which is the glue-like and indigestible part of plants.
There is still a fair bit of research to do, but early modeling has suggested that with an increase in digestibility of 5-6% they can get an increase in milk production of up to 25%
Salt/drought tolerant cereals
Australian Centre for Plant functional genomics are working on a whole range of crops better adapted to abiotic stresses
Disease-resistance
Loads of research groups worldwide are working on this problem with a range of crops and diseases. In Australia, CSIRO is doing work resistance to rust fungi.
Questions
So should these crops be developed?
To what extent can they help with food security?
Under what circumstances, if ever, should they be introduced?
What are the barriers to getting these GM crops developed – technical, ethical or social?
Big picture questions
What sort of agricultural or food production systems do we want to ensure food security in the next few decades?
What are the acceptable means by which we are prepared to achieve this?
What role, if any, should transgenic (Genetic Modification) technologies play?
Start the discussion early on event’s discussion board
If you are coming to the event you can pose questions or initiate a discussion on the event’s discussion board. There is no registration required, just follow the instruction on the page. Click on the “Discuss” tab on the home page. We will use as many of the questions as possible on the night as part of the discussion.
Don’t forget we will be tweeting live from the event. You can follow what is happening with #GTmenu You can even pose a question via Twitter.

Jason, here are some additional questions for the conversation on Wednesday:
Among the many fears and misconceptions surrounding GM crops (e.g. “my apple has a pork gene – I won’t be a vegan anymore!” or “what if the genes go into me and alter my DNA!”) is that from the farmers where the a commercial entity creates a closed loop system forcing farmers to rely on a single locked down system that requires year-on-year repurchase of seed, fertiliser and weed control from the one firm places a greater strain on already tight profit margins.
If we are to be serious about food security, should we ensure that the crops developed to achieve the goal of an improvement to grow more of the right foods more efficiently, should that definition also include the requirement that the crops do not have commercially motivated limitations?
Should GM research be allowed to be patented and/or sold to private firms?
Should they (and the resulting crops) remain within the domain of a government or independent governing body to ensure equitable management?
Lok Forward to Wednesday!
Thanks Taiss. I will get them posted on the event discussion board
jason, TechNyou
At present, there are hungry African who are on the verge of death. Any emerging technology in the endeavour to save human from starvation will be a short term solution.
A long term scenario will require a mindset of sustainable thinkings and actions.
Our living habits nurture obesity, diabetes, heart disease and many other long term illnesses.
Our lifestyle is unbalanced, with food waste.
Can people accept a diet with less meat as protein intake?
Should we educate ourselves to ration our food consumption for a moderate balance?
The question is in developed countries, we strive on the notion of “quality of life”.
Are hungry people prepare to starve to death as a choice of lifestyle quality? Or they would consume the GM food, and accept the consequence?
A lot of Australian farmland are sold to foreign investors. That is a shortfall solution, which might impact our food security in the next 20 years or more.
Could our conscience save us and drive us to a clarity of a sustainable culture?
ET. You are correct sometimes society can get obsessed with the technical fix to our problems, but I am pretty sure last night’s panel, Rob included, would disagree with you about any emerging technology is a short term solution to starvation. As raised last night (by Peter, I think) none will say it is THE solution, but technology can play a role. The question is what role for what technology? What is the appropriate or acceptable use and under what circumstances? The tractor is technology, as is satellite guided tractors. Marker-assisted selection is an emerging technology and is a powerful plant breeding tool. As for all you other points, I think all four panel members and probably most of the audience would agree generally with what you have said. Have you checked the Julian Cribb video I gave the link to? His talk covers a lot of the issues you mention. If not it is here http://tinyurl.com/6zswtjm
Jason TechNyou